Article
Column
In the LNG industry chain, the LNG supply
market is in the upstream, the end point is usually natural gas liquefaction
plant, and the LNG demand market is in the downstream, with the LNG receiving
terminal as the starting point. Generally, there is a certain distance between
the LNG supply market and the demand market, and LNG carriers connect the
global LNG supply market and the demand market. On the demand market side, large LNG carriers can use ship-to-ship
(STS) transfer to increase downstream cargo distribution channels through LNG
floating storage and regasification
units (FSRU), small and medium-sized LNG carriers and LNG bunkering
ships .
In the process of STS transfer, the larger LNG
carrier usually becomes the mother ship (or unloading ship) and the smaller
ship becomes the sub-ship (or receiving ship).
The LNG STS transfer solution involves the
technologies such as transfer compatibility assessment, site risk assessment,
transfer process, risk assessment, and contingency plans.
Evaluation of LNG Ship-to-Ship Transfer
Compatibility
When
STS transfer operations
are planned, the compatibility of the mother ship and sub-ships should
be ensured from the point of design and equipment, and the compatibility shall
be evaluated to confirm the ship's suitability for planned transfer operations.
Besides, any factors that may require special attention shall be identified .
Compatibility evaluation of STS transfer operation
includes but is not limited to:
(1) Ship characteristics required by STS transfer
plan;
(2)
Minimum operating speed and
corresponding rotational speed (RPM);
(3)
Layout , size and quantity of manifolds used;
(4) Number
of available hose connections;
(5) The
minimum and maximum estimated height of cargo manifold from waterline, and the
freeboard difference during cargo transfer;
(6) Whether the hose lifting equipment is in
good condition and has appropriate safe working load (SWL) and working range;
(7) The
side hose bracket shall be sufficient to prevent damage to the hose due to friction;
(8) Cargo handling equipment, types of cargo
pumps and any restrictions necessary to ensure the safe transfer of cargo;
(9) Maximum permissible pumping/ receiving
rates for all ships involved in the design;
(10) Mooring arrangement, including the mooring
line type and the requirements of closed cable guide;
(11)
Relevant requirements for displacement, draft, freeboard and parallel
hull length and fender on arrival and departure of ships;
(12) In terms of the horizontal and vertical
maps of hazardous areas and gas safety areas, the height change of cargo decks
of all participating ships and the overlap of flammable areas of each ship
shall be taken into account;
(13) Information about any obstructions that
obviously affect the airflow, may cause eddy current and affect the shape and
concentration of any gas in the vent. When two ships are alongside, the
discharge of the smaller ship will cause danger to the upper deck and operating
area of the larger ship;
(14) The danger of smoke and spark caused by
wind direction;
(15)
Personnel transfer scheme (if applicable);
(16) Emergency shutdown device (ESD) and
communication system;
(17) Emergency plans and procedures;
(18) Cargo transfer and ballast plan, including
estimated duration;
(19) Cargo vapor handling capacity of each
ship, and cargo vapor handling capacity and compatibility when cargo vapor recovery/equalization
is used;
(20) Temperature, pressure and density of cargo
in two ships.
In STS transfer operation, ships with total
length difference less than 10% are usually considered to have similar ship
lengths. Additional measures shall be taken to reduce the risk to an acceptable
level for STS transfer of ships with similar ship lengths:
1.
The optimal
mooring arrangement shall be determined.
As the head line becomes a horizontal line, it is necessary to arrange
the additional lines at the fore and aft of the ship for compensation;
2.
The best
fastening scheme of the fender shall be
determined to ensure that the fender will not be damaged due to the lack of fairlead/fairleader;
3.
The front and
rear positions of the ship shall be adjusted so that the bridge wings of the
two ships are offset and staggered. In this process, all the main fenders are ensured in parallel
with the hull of the two ships during the whole operation, and the hose length
shall be sufficient to adapt to the manifold offset caused by the movement of
the two ships;
4.
In the mooring
and transfer operation, additional headlines shall be added to resist the
impact force acting on the exposed bow to prevent the bow from deviating;
5.
A
larger-diameter fender is adopted to increase the distance between two ships;
6.
After
considering the guidance and effectiveness of mooring lines configuration, the
environmental factor limitation can be reduced .
Risk Assessment of LNG Ship-to- Ship Transfer
Operation Site
A risk assessment shall be carried out each
time a new transfer site is selected, and the results of the risk assessment
shall be incorporated into the specific operating procedures for establishing
the transfer site, including the implementation of appropriate safeguards to
ensure that the identified risks are effectively managed .
The risk assessment shall consider the impacts
and possibilities associated with the identified hazards specific to the
transfer site, and shall also include the assessment of residual risks after
appropriate safeguards, controls or mitigation measures have been taken.
Factors to be considered in risk assessment
include, but are not limited to:
(1) Requirements of local laws and regulations;
(2) Open water or sheltered water for operation
under the normal environmental conditions, including the appropriate marine meteorological
analysis;
(3) Whether berthing and unberthing operations
are carried out when the ships are sailing, anchoring or alongside;
(4) Whether transfer operation is carried out
when two ships are sailing, anchoring or alongside;
(5) Traffic density in the vicinity of the
transfer site, including the existence of other STS transfer operations;
(6) Gas leakage and diffusion trajectory and
potential environmental impact;
(7)
Whether there are any other resources and availability of spill response
requirements at the transfer site;
(8) Availability and capability of on-site ship
support;
(9) Completeness of operations and resources
for any support provided by local interested parties on site;
(10) A security threat present on the transfer
site;
(11) Operating environment restrictions, including
standards for suspension of operations;
(12) Navigation risks near the transfer site.
When considering the applicability of the new
transfer site, anchoring or mooring analysis shall be performed to determine the operating environment
parameters of transfer operation.
Figure 1 Flow Chart of LNG STS Transfer Operation
Operation Flow of LNG Ship-to- Ship Transfer
The main process of LNG STS transfer operation
includes pre-operation preparation stage, operation stage and post-operation stage,
as shown in Figure 1.
Risk Assessment of LNG Ship-to- Ship Transfer
Operation
Risk assessment shall be conducted prior to STS
transfer operations and shall contain sufficient information to ensure a good
understanding of the operations and effective control. Risk assessment shall
cover the physical and operational hazards and their management means, as well
as the suitability of equipment .
Risk a ssessment is an important part before
STS transfer operation plan, and at least the following factors shall be considered:
(1) Ship compatibility , including mooring
arrangements;
(2) Suitability of specific working place;
(3) The characteristics of the transfer cargo;
(4) Training, experience and qualifications of
personnel;
(5) Proper ship preparation for operation and
adequate control measures during operation;
(6) Adequacy of navigation procedures;
(7) Enough personnel to control and execute the
transfer operation;
(8) Adequate communication between the ships
and/or the persons in charge;
(9)
Influence of the difference of freeboard during transfer;
(10) Equipment, including fenders and transfer
hoses;
(11) Expected environmental conditions;
(12) Emergency plans and procedures .
For LNG STS transfer operations, some high-risk
scenarios usually need to be considered. There are cases of causal factors that
may lead to high risks, and describes the events or activities that may help
trigger specific risks. Understanding the causal factors will help to develop
the appropriate measures against obstacles and the risk prevention measures to
minimizing the occurrence of related risks, as well as the risk mitigation
measures .
Contingency Plan for LNG Ship-to- Ship Transfer
Operation
Contingency plans shall be made for LNG STS
transfer operation to deal with the accident risks and various potential
consequences. Risk mitigation measures and contingency plans shall cover all
possible emergencies and provide comprehensive and integrated responses.
The contingency plan shall also be relevant to
the operation site and have the available support resources in and around the
transfer area considered. Where appropriate, the contingency plan shall be
combined with similar plans or requirements formulated by local competent
authorities. The contingency plan shall
at least cover the following contents:
(1)Procedures for issuing alarms;
(2)Stop operation during emergency;
(3)Notification procedure;
(4)Emergency workstation and preparation to
start emergency procedures;
(5)Personnel assembly at the mooring point;
(6)Emergency disassembly of cargo transfer
equipment;
(7)Main engines preparation for manoeuvring;
(8)Unberthing .
Common emergencies of LNG STS transfer
operation include the emergency during berthing operation, gas accumulation on
deck, accidental cargo leakage, activation of emergency disconnection system,
hose treatment after release of emergency disconnection device,
activation of emergency disconnection device of paralyzed ship, inspection and
test of transfer system, emergency cut-off system in connected state,
compatibility, connection and use of emergency cut-off system, test of
emergency break-off system and emergency cut-off system, etc .
Prospect of Application Scenario of LNG
Ship-to-Ship Transfer Technology
STS transfer mode provides great convenience
for downstream cargo distribution of LNG carriers and improves the speed of LNG
trade circulation. At present, this solution has attracted the attention of
clean energy suppliers and shipping enterprises. First, in the countries and regions with weak infrastructure and slow
construction speed, the technical solution of liquefied natural gas floating
storage and regasification unit (FSRU) is often adopted for natural gas supply,
and FSRU usually needs to supply cargo from LNG carriers by STS transfer.
Second, as some LNG receiving terminals are located in the limited waters of
waterway water depth (such as Yangtze River and Pearl River inland waters),
large LNG carriers cannot enter the port to unload cargo, STS transfer is
usually used to unload cargo to small LNG carriers, and small LNG carriers that
are not limited by waterway water depth unload cargo, which is adopted by
Dongguan LNG receiving terminal of JOVO Group. Third, the distance between the
polar Yamal LNG project and the LNG receiving terminal now includes two parts:
the ice waters and the open waters. The open water performance of large
ice-class LNG carriers invested in this project is poor in open waters, and
thus the STS transfer is generally used to unload cargo to the ordinary large
LNG carriers in open waters near ice areas, and the ordinary large LNG carriers
sail into ports to unload cargo. Finally, since the second half of 2021, LNG
power ships have developed rapidly, the port LNG fuel filling market has
flourished, and the LNG bunkering ships can receive cargo at LNG receiving
terminals near the port by reverse transportation, or directly receive cargo
from large LNG carriers by STS transfer.
China Classification Society (CCS) assists
CNOOC and JOVO Group to carry out LNG STS transfer operation at home and
abroad, and provides full technical support, which is unanimously recognized by
customers and competent authorities .